COVID-19   Law    Advocacy    Topics A-Z     Training    Wrights' Blog   Wrightslaw Store    Yellow Pages for Kids

The Special Ed Advocate newsletter It's Unique ... and Free! Enter your email address below: 2025 Training Programs Mar. 18-19 - VA via ZOOM May 3 - WV via ZOOM Sept. 18 - MD via ZOOM Full Schedule Wrightslaw Home Topics from A-Z Free Newsletter Seminars & Training Yellow Pages for Kids Press Room FAQs Sitemap Books & Training Wrightslaw Store   Advocate's Store   Student Bookstore   Exam Copies Training Center Mail & Fax Orders Advocacy Library Articles Cool Tools Doing Your Homework Ask the Advocate FAQs Newsletter Archives Short Course Series Success Stories Tips Law Library Articles Caselaw Fed Court Complaints IDEA 2004 McKinney-Vento Homeless FERPA Section 504 Topics Advocacy ADD/ADHD Allergy/Anaphylaxis American Indian Assistive Technology Autism Spectrum Behavior & Discipline Bullying College/Continuing Ed Damages Discrimination Due Process Early Intervention   (Part C) Eligibility Episodic, such as    Allergies, Asthma,    Diabetes, Epilepsy, etc ESSA ESY Evaluations FAPE Flyers Future Planning Harassment High-Stakes Tests Homeless Children IDEA 2004 Identification & Child Find IEPs Juvenile Justice Law School & Clinics Letters & Paper Trails LRE / Inclusion Mediation Military / DOD Parental Protections PE and Adapted PE Privacy & Records Procedural Safeguards Progress Monitoring Reading Related Services Research Based   Instruction Response to Intervention   (RTI) Restraints / Seclusion    and Abuse Retention Retaliation School Report Cards Section 504 Self-Advocacy Teachers & Principals Transition Twice Exceptional (2e) VA Special Education Resources & Directories Advocate's Bookstore Advocacy Resources Directories   Disability Groups   International   State DOEs   State PTIs Free Flyers Free Pubs Free Newsletters Legal & Advocacy Glossaries    Legal Terms    Assessment Terms Best School Websites

The Special Ed Advocate Did a School District Restrain and/or Isolate Young Children with Disabilities? What Did Investigators Find? What Happened Next? Print this page In October 2020, the Department of Justice's Civil Rights Division opened an investigation into the discriminatory use of seclusion and restraint against children with disabilities in Frederick County Public Schools (MD). What Did the Investigators Find? On December 1, 2021, the Justice Department sent a letter to Frederick County Public Schools that described their findings. The investigation revealed thousands of incidents of seclusion and restraint against children with disabilities, some as young as five, in two and a half school years. "The District performed 7,253 seclusions and restraints on 125 students. Although students with disabilities make up approximately 11% of students enrolled in the District, every single student the District secluded was a student with disabilities, as were 99% -- all but one -- of the students the District restrained." "The District restrained 34 students with disabilities more than 50 times." The investigators determined that the District routinely used seclusion and restraints in ordinary, non-emergency situations. "Despite state law and the District's own policy, the District did not limit its use of seclusion and restraint to 'emergency situations' in which seclusion or restraint were 'necessary to protect a student or other person from imminent, serious, physical harm.'" The investigators found that "the District's use of seclusion and restraints escalated the children's behaviors and heightened their distress." Some children tried to harm themselves and showed other signs of trauma. "The District did not stop individual seclusion incidents despite students demonstrating that they were in crisis and in need of support." What Happened Next? In October 2021, the District approached the Justice Department and expressed interest in voluntarily entering into a settlement agreement to address concerns about the District's use of seclusion and restraint on students with disabilities. On November 30, 2021, the District and the Justice Department entered into a settlement agreement. Under the settlement with the Department of Justice, Frederick County school officials agreed to take corrective actions, including but not limited to: prohibiting the use of seclusion; reporting all instances of restraints and evaluating whether they were justified; designating trained staff to collect and analyze restraint data and create appropriate behavior intervention plans; offering counseling and compensatory education services to children with disabilities who were subjected to the district's discriminatory practices. Read the full text of the Settlement Agreement in U.S. v. Frederick County Public School District. News Release: In Restraint and Seclusion Case, Justice Department Reaches Settlement with Maryland School District to Protect Students with Disabilities from Abuse. Do You Know a Child Who Has Been Forcibly Restrained at School? What Can You Do? File a Complaint with the Justice Department The Civil Rights Division enforces federal laws that protect you from discrimination based on your race, color, national origin, disability status, sex, religion, familial status, or loss of other constitutional rights. If you believe a child's civil rights or your civil rights have been violated, you can submit a report to the Civil Rights Division by using this online form. Understanding Your Rights ProPublica is investigating the use of restraint in schools ProPublica is an independent, nonprofit newsroom that produces investigative journalism to shine a light on abuses of power and betrayals of public trust. ProPublica is interested in hearing from parents, educators and others who know children who have been restrained or inappropriately disciplined in a school setting. To learn more, read Do You Know a Child Who's Been Forcibly Restrained in School? A School That Followed a New Path We wanted to end this article on a positive note by sharing the story of a school that stopped using restraint and seclusion and how that worked out for the school and their students. How One Virginia School Stopped Relying on Restraining and Isolating Students -- and What Others Can Learn From It. Wrightslaw Special Education Law and Advocacy Training Programs Return We are happy to report that Wrightslaw Training Programs are baaack! March 11-12, 2022: Charleston, WV - Special Education Law and Advocacy Training - Two-Day Bootcamp sponsored by Community Autism Resources & Education Systems (CARES). Speakers: Pete and Pam Wright. March 17, 2022: Savannah, GA - Special Education Law and Advocacy Training sponsored by A. Kelly Neal, Esq. and Georgia Legal Services Program. Speaker: Pete Wright. March 25-26, 2022: Red Bluff, CA - From Emotions to Advocacy Training sponsored by Tehama County SELPA. Speaker: Pat Howey. March 31, 2022: Nashua, NH - Special Education Law and Advocacy Training sponsored by the Parent Information Center of NH. Speaker: Pete Wright. April 14, 2022: Burlington, VT - Special Education Law and Advocacy Training, sponsored by Vermont Family Network. Speaker: Pete Wright. June 9, 2022: Tifton, GA - Special Education Law and Advocacy Training sponsored by The Conner Group. Speaker: Pete Wright. When is Wrightslaw Coming to Your City? Get the answer here. The Special Ed Advocate: It's Free! About the Book To Order About the Book To Order About the Book To Order About the Book To Order About the DVD Video To Order   Copyright © 1998-2024, Peter W. D. Wright and Pamela Darr Wright. All rights reserved. Contact Us | Press l Mission l Our Awards l Privacy Policy l Disclaimer l Site Map

Order Wrightslaw Products Today and Save 25% Apply Coupon Code DEC2024 Check Out The Advocate's Store! Update Your Listing!   Wrightslaw Books About the Book About the Book About the Book About the Book About the Book About the DVD Video The Advocate's Store Understanding Your Child's Test Scores (1.5 hrs) Wrightslaw Special: $14.95