COVID-19   Law    Advocacy    Topics A-Z     Training    Wrights' Blog   Wrightslaw Store    Yellow Pages for Kids 
 Home > Books  > Stephen Jeffers v. School Board - Special Education Due Process Hearing


The Special Ed Advocate newsletter
It's Unique ... and Free!

Enter your email address below:

2024-2025
Training Programs

Aug. 22 - TRT-CLE

Sept. 24 - MD via ZOOM

Nov. 16 - WV via ZOOM

2025

Mar. 18-19 - VA via ZOOM

Full Schedule


Wrightslaw

Home
Topics from A-Z
Free Newsletter
Seminars & Training
Yellow Pages for Kids
Press Room
FAQs
Sitemap

Books & Training

Wrightslaw Storesecure store lock
  Advocate's Store
  Student Bookstore
  Exam Copies
Training Center
Mail & Fax Orders

Advocacy Library

Articles
Cool Tools
Doing Your Homework
Ask the Advocate
FAQs
Newsletter Archives
Short Course Series
Success Stories
Tips

Law Library

Articles
Caselaw
Fed Court Complaints
IDEA 2004
McKinney-Vento Homeless
FERPA
Section 504

Topics

Advocacy
ADD/ADHD
Allergy/Anaphylaxis
American Indian
Assistive Technology
Autism Spectrum
Behavior & Discipline
Bullying
College/Continuing Ed
Damages
Discrimination
Due Process
Early Intervention
  (Part C)

Eligibility
Episodic, such as
   Allergies, Asthma,
   Diabetes, Epilepsy, etc

ESSA
ESY
Evaluations
FAPE
Flyers
Future Planning
Harassment
High-Stakes Tests
Homeless Children
IDEA 2004
Identification & Child Find
IEPs
Juvenile Justice
Law School & Clinics
Letters & Paper Trails
LRE / Inclusion
Mediation
Military / DOD
Parental Protections
PE and Adapted PE
Privacy & Records
Procedural Safeguards
Progress Monitoring
Reading
Related Services
Research Based
  Instruction

Response to Intervention
  (RTI)

Restraints / Seclusion
   and Abuse

Retention
Retaliation
School Report Cards
Section 504
Self-Advocacy
Teachers & Principals
Transition
Twice Exceptional (2e)
VA Special Education

Resources & Directories

Advocate's Bookstore
Advocacy Resources
Directories
  Disability Groups
  International
  State DOEs
  State PTIs
Free Flyers
Free Pubs
Free Newsletters
Legal & Advocacy
Glossaries
   Legal Terms
   Assessment Terms
Best School Websites

 

Stephen Jeffers v. School Board - Special Education Due Process Hearing

Stephen Jeffers v. School Board will take you through a due process hearing, from initial preparations to testimony by the final witness.

Parents react when school board attorney asks that their case be dismissedThe Individuals with Disabilities Education Act requires that public schools provide a free, appropriate education to qualifying students with disabilities. If there is a disagreement between parents and their school district, either party my request a special education due process hearing.

The Virginia Legal Advocacy Clinic, VAVS, Wrightslaw, and Harbor House Law Press joined forces to create this video of a special education due process hearing. This video is based on an actual case.

The cast includes:

* Darrel Tillar Mason, Esq. Former member of the Virginia Board of Education and hearing officer
* Kathleen S. Mason, Esq. Nationally-known school board attorney
* Peter W. D. Wright, Esq. Parent attorney

Synopsis

Background

Stephen Jeffers is a young child with autism. Two years ago, his parents placed him in The Early School, a private special education school that provides intensive one-on-one ABA therapy to youngsters with autism. Stephen made substantial progress at the Early School.

Stephen's parents, Mr. and Ms. JeffersThe parents requested reimbursement for Stephen's education at The Early School. The school district refused, and offered to place Stephen into the public school's special education class. The parents

The parents requested a special education due process hearing to resolve this dispute.

In the video, you see how a case is prepared and presented by both sides. The procedure may remind you of a courtroom. In many states, due process hearings are quite formal.

Each state has specific regulations that govern the procedure to request a special education due process hearing and the appointment of hearing officers.

Kathy Mehfoud and Lori Battin prepare their caseWhen this story begins, the school board attorney has learned about the parents' request for a due process hearing.

As the school board attorney (played by attorney Kathleen Mehfoud) discusses the case with her paralegal (Lori Battin), you learn how she prepares her case.

Dismissed?

Both sides are responsible for preparing their own case.

There are very specific rules that must be followed in due process hearings.
The parents' case was nearly dismissed because they misunderstood the legal requirements for exchange of documents and witness lists. The Hearing Officer rules  on motion to dismiss

The Hearing Officer presides over the procedure, listens to all testimony, weighs the evidence and makes decisions. Generally, it is not the Hearing Officer's responsibility to assist either party.

The school board attorney requested that the parents' case be dismissed.

After hearing from both sides, the hearing officer (played by Darrel Tillar Mason) gave the parents a 30 day continuance to prepare their case -- over the objections of school board counsel.

Searching for an Attorney

Mr. and Ms. Jeffers begin their search for an attorney who can represent them - not an easy task.

After a telephone call to Pete Wright about their situation, they decide to meet with him.

Parents meet with Pete and Pam WrightPreparing for the Due Process Hearing

During their meeting with Pete and Pam Wright, Pete discusses the issues of their case and discusses strategies.

He gives the parents a long list of things to learn and do before their due process hearing resumes.

As Pete tells the Jeffers, "The key to a successful outcome is preparation, preparation, preparation."

Due Process Hearing

Cross examination of child psychologist and independent evaluatorThe School Board Presents Its Case

Issues raised by the school board include:

* Lack of certain related services at the private school;

* Absence of "group experience" prevents learning from non-disabled peers;

Cross-examination of school witness by Pete Wright * Benefits of the public school program and progress made by other students.

You see exciting direct examination, dramatic cross-examination, arguments between counsel and objections to hearsay and leading questions.




The Parents Present Their Case

Candace David, head of The Early SchoolIssues raised by the parents include:

* Public school teachers and service providers are already overburdened.

* Stephen requires on-on-one instruction to progress;

* The public school program will damage Stephen;Rhonda Jeffers, Stephen's mother

* Stephen's behavior is too severe and unusual for a group classroom setting.

Stephen's mother is the last witness to testify.

She shares her fears that if Stephen has to leave The Early School at this point, he will regress and and lose the gains he has made over the past two years.



Email Newsletter icon, E-mail Newsletter icon, Email List icon, E-mail List icon The Special Ed Advocate: It's Free!