High-Stakes
Lawsuit in Massachusetts:
How High Are the Stakes?
by Pamela Wright
Print
this page
In
1999, Pete wrote, "IDEA requirements about assessing disabled
children on state testing may lead parents to realize that their child
is not benefiting from special education. Litigation may begin sooner
when this part of the statute takes effect." (Wrightslaw:
Special Education Law, page 48-49)
Since 1999, lawsuits have been filed in in several states, including
California, Oregon, and Indiana.
On September 19, 2002, six students from the Holyoke and Springfield
areas filed a lawsuit against the state department
of education and Holyoke school district.
How
High are the Stakes?
Assume a student has a learning disability with deficits in reading
and math. Assume the school district did not provide the student with
remediation to strengthen these weak skills.
Assume the student does not drop out. He works hard and perseveres.
Assume he passes all his courses. Assume he is on the Honor Roll.
Assume the student fails the English and math sections of the state
high-stakes test.
Assume he lives in Massachusetts (or any state that requires students
to pass a test to graduate from high school).
Assume he was one of 12,000 Massachusetts seniors who failed the Massachusetts
Comprehensive Assessment System (MCAS) exam (that's right 12,000!).
Under current state standards, unless he passes the MCAS, our student
will not receive a high school diploma in June.
In Massachusetts, a student cannot attend a state college or university
without a diploma. If our student applies to an independent college
or university, he will find that a diploma or its equivalent is required.
Reading &
Math
According to the U.S. Department of Education, only one-third of
fourth-graders are able to read at a proficient level. "This
means that nearly two-thirds of fourth-graders have a greater likelihood
of dropping out and a lifetime of diminished success." (The
Facts About Reading Achievement, U.S. Department of Education)
Math scores are even worse. "Only a quarter of our fourth- and
eighth-graders are performing at or above proficient levels in math.
Twelfth-grade math scores have not improved since 1996 . . . "
Less than 20 percent of twelfth graders are proficient in math.
(The
Facts About Math Achievement, U.S. Department of Education)
Teacher Quality
Nothing is more important to a child's success in school than well-prepared
teachers. But millions of children do not have well-prepared teachers.
(The
Facts About Good Teachers, U.S. Department of Education)
Assume our student did not learn reading and math skills because he
was not taught by well-prepared teachers. If he fails the high-stakes
test because he was not taught by well-trained teachers, should he
be punished because the state and local school district did not ensure
that he was taught by well-prepared teachers?
According
to a study prepared for The New England Council's Commission on High
Technology Workforce Development, more than one-quarter of all
newly hired secondary teachers in Massachusetts were not certified
in their area of teaching responsibility.
"The shortage was particularly acute among special education,
foreign language and math and science teachers." ("Shortages
and Certified Teachers" by Richard M. Freeland and Peter
Meade, Boston Globe, December 11, 2001)
"The evidence shows, for example, that students whose teachers
have been trained in their subjects perform better than students whose
teachers lack subject-matter preparation. Yet each year about a third
of teachers in U.S. schools are assigned at least one class a day
for which they have not been trained." (Teacher
Quality, Education Week)
Lawsuit!
On September 19, six students from the Holyoke and Springfield areas
filed a lawsuit filed against the state department of education and
Holyoke school district.
According to The Boston Globe, "The case is the first legal assault
on what is regarded as one of the nation's toughest graduation exams,
and lawyers will ask a judge to certify it as a class-action suit."
The suit alleges that the Massachusetts Comprehensive Assessment System
(MCAS) exam discriminates against students with disabilities, minority
students, and students with limited-English skills. The complaint
also alleges that the state education department does not have the
authority to make the MCAS test a requirement for graduation.
"About 19 percent of the class of 2003, about 12,000 high-schoolers,
still have to pass the 10th-grade math or English section of the MCAS
test to earn a diploma. Failure rates for minority, disabled, and
limited-English students are twice or three times as high." (Lawsuit
says many students ill-prepared for MCAS by Anand Vaishnav, Boston
Globe, Sept 20, 2002)
In
Massachusetts, the 1993 Education Reform Act created mandatory curriculum
frameworks for key subjects in every grade. The Education Reform Law
also raised the bar for teachers by requiring them to pass a literacy/communication
test. (Mass.
Dept of Ed. website)
The lawsuit alleges that students who are scheduled to graduate in
2003 have not had enough exposure to the curriculum standards measured
by the MCAS exam.
Compromise?
On September 23, the Massachusetts Education Commissioner proposed
that students who do not pass the MCAS test could receive a "local
certificate"' instead of a high school diploma. (Education
boss will propose alternative to H.S. diplomas by Ed Hayward,
Boston Herald, September 24, 2002)
Not all members of the Massachusetts Education Commission agree with
this proposal. The former chairman of the Board of Education criticized
the local certificate option. He recommended that students who fail
MCAS take the GED exam:
"'(The
GED) would get you further than a local certificate. Unlike the local
certificate, it would mean something,'' said John Silber, chancellor
of Boston University. 'A local certificate says nothing but that we
have decided to give a high school diploma to a student who has failed,
failed a test at the most modest level conceivable.''' (Education
boss will propose alternative to H.S. diplomas by Ed Hayward,
Boston Herald, Sept. 24, 2002)
Will a "local certificate" solve our student's problem?
Is a "local certificate" an acceptable substitute for a
real high school diploma? Is a certificate an acceptable substitute
for teaching basic skills?
If we do not teach children the basic skills they need to make it
in life, we betray them. If we punish children because they do not
learn skills we fail to teach, we betray them again.
What do you think?
Information
Cited in this Article
Education
boss will propose alternative to H.S. diplomas by Ed Hayward,
Boston Herald, Sept. 24, 2002)
Lawsuit
Says Many Students Ill-Prepared for MCAS by Anand Vaishnav,
Boston Globe, Sept 20, 2002)
Shortages
and Certified Teachers" by Richard M. Freeland and Peter
Meade, Boston Globe, December 11, 2001). Richard Freeland is president
of Northeastern University and co-chair of The New England Council's
Commission on High Technology Labor Market Development. Peter Meade
is chairman of the New England Council.
Teaching
Quality Viewed as Essential by Mary-Ellen Phelps Deily, Education
Week, July 10, 2002)
Teacher
Quality, Education Week.
The
Facts About Good Teachers, U. S. Department of Education.
The
Facts About Reading Achievement, U. S. Department of Education.
The
Facts About Math Achievement, U. S. Department of Education.
The
Facts About Measuring Progress, U. S. Department of Education
Free
Pubs
Disability
Rights Advocates, Do
No Harm - High Stakes Testing and Students with Learning Disabilities (2001).
Describes
accommodations, alternate assessments, appeals, procedures, and other
safeguards that should be implemented for statewide assessment systems
to comply with the law and guarantee educationally sound opportunities
to students with learning disabilities. Download
To
order bound copies, contact Disability Rights Advocates, 449 15th
Street, Suite 303. Oakland, CA 94612-2821. Phone: 510-451-8644
Center for Education Policy, State
High School Exit Exams: A Baseline Report (2002).
Report includes data for all states with current or planned exit exams;
case studies in five states; a review of major research; recommendations
to ensure that exit exams are implemented well and lead to greater
learning. (pdf, 148 pages)
Copies of the summary of the report are free. Copies of full report
are $10.00 (includes postage and handling); you can download
the full 148 page report free from the Center's website.